Opening the floodgates of democracy in China

"Prospects for Democracy."

In reading the second excerpt from Guthrie, it really shows that communism in China is vulnerable to collapse. There are several forces from past and present situations that have lead to this unstable state of politics.

Guthrie continues to assert that Deng's push for economic reform and freedom in China is a huge reason that political freedom is increasingly being called for. With private enterprises forming in China, more jobs opened up for young people to take up. These jobs, unlike government jobs, would allow them to express their opinions without fear of losing their job, career, or freedom. Additionally, if college students decide to express support for democracy in their clubs and scholastic life, they still have numerous business-related companies willing and happy to hire them. This type of climate encourages young Chinese to think however they desire.

Then Tiananmen Square protests and subsequent military intervention occured in 1989. This movement seems important for democracy in China for a number of reasons. First of all, students opened the movement to ordinary, less educated citizens in a way it was never available to them before. All of a sudden, a different, much larger population felt power to change their status. Second, the violence taken against the students really showed how oppressive the government was. The pictures and stories spread by the international media also helped to show both internal and external parties that communist forces were using violence to squash something other societies in the world feel is a human right, freedom of expression.

After this pivotal event, free enterprise in China really took off. This lead to another group that erodes the communist hold in China: entrepreneurs and private business owners. These people have security in their businesses and money and this are not fearful of the starvation and loss of jobs that can occur when someone fights the government. Thus, this group is not afraid to fight for democratic practices that would further benefit economy and autonomy for their industries in China.

A final factor in creating an environment for democracy in China is the currently evolving free-flow of information evident not only in China but also the whole world. Journalists in China have more choice in opinion after Tiananmen allowed them to showcase the human rights issues. And now, the Internet has allowed internal journalists to communicate with the world and the world to communicate with China about political issues. Thus, with current technology, people in China are more aware of what other political systems exist in the world.

It makes sense that China is on a path to be more open and grass-roots centered. The people have more choice between communism and other ways and feel less fear that going against the grain will ruin the rest of their lives. The evidence is clear in the dissident blogs scattered all over the Internet.

One such site I visited is . The site is interesting because it not only lists current issues important to non-party members, but it also has a special section devoted to current political prisoners. This can be accessed through Beijing Olympics 2008 Take Action Now! link and selecting one of the photos listed. It provides a face to the human rights violation previously abstract to both the Chinese people and more importantly the rest of the world. A picture of the prisoner featured this month is above. He is one of the brave faces of the new, less cautious Chinese people.

Deng Didn't Downright Democratize, Duh.

Balancing Development with Democracy

Shaohua Hu explored Deng's policies and politics in this article. Essentially Deng wanted a communist government, like Mao, but saw a lot wrong in the system. He wanted to lead the government and the people in a different way but not with a different way.

Deng's leadership differed in a number of ways:

1) He focused on economic reform. Unlike Mao, Deng thought that as long as people were fed, had jobs, had money, they would be happier than having, say, the right to vote

“It does not take Marx of Maslow to understand why a piece of bread serves a hungry person better than a piece of ballot-paper.”

2)Deng took the focus off of the class-based struggle Mao enhanced. This meant that people would no longer resent the rich but rather work for everyone's good

3)Deng rehabilitated Mao's counter-revolutionary opponents. Mao had failed to get riud of his opposition effectively. This was something Deng made sure to do.

4.) Deng made communists less ideological and more practical. He helped the party members realize that the design and structure of every system was not the most important facet as long as it did what it was supposed to.

5.) Deng opened China up to foreign investment and the world. He knew this would be necessary if China was to emerge as an economic world power. Mao feared this.

Essentially, Deng found a way to make communism meet people's needs the way Mao's communism didn't. Mao made everyone focus on an illusion communism as equaling everyone but Deng showed people that this was not reality. He combated this by making economic reforms that put more control in local and private hands where the individual and the market could make or break a person's prosperity. This allowed people to be happy with their own efforts in the economy while not worrying about their involvement and freedom in politics.

It should not be said that Deng made no political reforms. He did make elections more free locally and reformed the judicial system to be more fair. He knew stability of politics was necessary for the economy to maintain its stability. He did not believe that political reform was necessary in order to bring about social and human rights reforms. He famously stated

"Change in the system. Not change of the system."

This worked for a while until Tiananmen Square happened in 1989. Students and intellectuals demanded rights for themselves and more rights within the current systems. Even still they were not demanding a change to democracy. This movement was squashed as they left peasants out of it and allowed Deng to show the rest of China how wrong the protesters were.

The result was that people unconditionally accepted Deng's communism as long as their economic interests continued to be protected. However, this was doomed to be a short-lived success. As political thinkers have studied in the past, once economic reforms take hold and people become stable with basic needs, they begin to look for more freedoms elsewhere. Because the poor were now fed, the has the energy to realize something else was missing.

This leads us to the protesting of human rights and other ideas happening in Pei's China. People have all the economic growth in the world but feel the government is still treating them bad. Deng may have worked his entire reign to make communist China stand with economic freedom but his intended efforts will lead to an unintended end.

Mao Money, Mao Problems

"Setting the Stage"

The article by Doug Guthrie outlines how Mao Zedong started the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949. The leader created a communist government where the state controls almost every facet of life and every person, industry, job, everything is organized, sorted, and distributed the way the government saw fit.

A few key factors defined Mao's China. First, the government encouraged its people to protest and challenge certain conditions existing in China. Mao told the Chinese people to fight against unfair employers, foreign invasion, and anti-communists. He informed them of what was good for them and then encouraged dissent against these institutions. Thus, Mao set the stage for social unrest.

Second, Mao's government controlled production and industry. Factories and agriculture were put under state control and forced to reach production quotas. This enabled Mao to exert control over the supply and demand of the country in 5 year plans.

Finally, China under Mao was organized into collective communities of 30-50 households. The people in each community produced goods and services for the whole to pool resources. However, the goods were distributed according to each home's contribution so the wealthy still received more than the poor. Another cause of social unrest.

Mao Zedong is the father of the conditions Pei stated in the article from my previous entry. He told the Chinese to protest and riot against employment, foreigners, and other evils. Essentially, the climate for social unrest was implanted into Chinese society. The lesson here for the Chinese was that if you don't like something, rise up and change it. We can see this today in China, except now the people are protesting for their own idea of acceptable life.

"But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao... you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow."

Deng Changes a Few Things

Guthrie goes on, in this article, to explain how the fall of Mao and his ideas spurred a new way under leader Deng. Deng's plan was to slowly change industry and agriculture from a state-controlled entity to locally owned and monitored one. He also encouraged more foreign investment, and a legal system to ensure corruption would always be stopped. The key here for Deng's success was slow changes. This transformed the environment in China greatly and their economy is the 6th largest in the world to date. However, some problems started under Mao continue to plague China and, again, this can be seen in the conditions of today's China under Jintao.

China's Progressing while Regressing

"China is Paying the Price of Social Unrest"

The author of this article, Pei, brings up a very interesting and paradoxical point regarding China's transformation in recent decades. China, yes, has definitely grown economically, industrially, and technologically. However, I honestly believe this was something the state desired and instituted.
My basis for this assumption comes from Pei's article. He states that the number of social uprisings has shown staggering increases in recent years.

The number of so-called "mass incidents" (sit-ins, riots, strikes, and demonstrations) reached 74,000 is 2004, an all-time high, and involved about 3.7m individuals. In 1994, by comparison, there were about 10,000 such incidents, with 730,000 participants.

Pei also notes that the triggers for these incidents are social and economic policies, such as high tax and land seizures, that help to facilitate the economic and industrial growth of China. Chinese people may not agree with how their country is changing and be angry that they must pay the price regardless.

This could be avoided with social care of people but such a climate is not present. China does not care for its poor, aging, or other interest groups and so the Chinese people feel they are taken from without being given anything. It's no wonder they are acting out more and more each year.

China wants to fix this so they can have a good reputation with the rest of the world. However, this is not a good reason as this, too, is a corrupt endeavor. The government is corrupt and just wants band-aids for the problems that can easily save face but do not fix the problems (i.e. publicly punish a select few officials while letting other continue their corrupt ways). If this continues, then the protests will, too.